TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Hakim-hakim 2:14

Konteks

2:14 The Lord was furious with Israel 1  and handed them over to robbers who plundered them. 2  He turned them over to 3  their enemies who lived around them. They could not withstand their enemies’ attacks. 4 

Mazmur 44:13

Konteks

44:13 You made us 5  an object of disdain to our neighbors;

those who live on our borders taunt and insult us. 6 

Yesaya 50:1

Konteks

50:1 This is what the Lord says:

“Where is your mother’s divorce certificate

by which I divorced her?

Or to which of my creditors did I sell you? 7 

Look, you were sold because of your sins; 8 

because of your rebellious acts I divorced your mother. 9 

Seret untuk mengatur ukuranSeret untuk mengatur ukuran

[2:14]  1 tn Or “The Lord’s anger burned [or “raged”] against Israel.”

[2:14]  2 tn Heb “robbers who robbed them.” (The verb שָׁסָה [shasah] appears twice in the verse.)

[2:14]  sn The expression robbers who plundered them is a derogatory reference to the enemy nations, as the next line indicates.

[2:14]  3 tn Heb “sold them into the hands of.”

[2:14]  4 tn The word “attacks” is supplied in the translation both for clarity and for stylistic reasons.

[44:13]  5 tn The prefixed verbal form is a preterite (without vav [ו] consecutive).

[44:13]  6 tn Heb “an [object of] taunting and [of] mockery to those around us.”

[50:1]  7 sn The Lord challenges the exiles (Zion’s children) to bring incriminating evidence against him. The rhetorical questions imply that Israel accused the Lord of divorcing his wife (Zion) and selling his children (the Israelites) into slavery to pay off a debt.

[50:1]  8 sn The Lord admits that he did sell the Israelites, but it was because of their sins, not because of some debt he owed. If he had sold them to a creditor, they ought to be able to point him out, but the preceding rhetorical question implies they would not be able to do so.

[50:1]  9 sn The Lord admits he did divorce Zion, but that too was the result of the nation’s sins. The force of the earlier rhetorical question comes into clearer focus now. The question does not imply that a certificate does not exist and that no divorce occurred. Rather, the question asks for the certificate to be produced so the accuser can see the reason for the divorce in black and white. The Lord did not put Zion away arbitrarily.



TIP #05: Coba klik dua kali sembarang kata untuk melakukan pencarian instan. [SEMUA]
dibuat dalam 0.03 detik
dipersembahkan oleh YLSA