TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Kejadian 37:35

Konteks
37:35 All his sons and daughters stood by 1  him to console him, but he refused to be consoled. “No,” he said, “I will go to the grave mourning my son.” 2  So Joseph’s 3  father wept for him.

Kejadian 37:1

Konteks
Joseph’s Dreams

37:1 But Jacob lived in the land where his father had stayed, 4  in the land of Canaan. 5 

1 Samuel 1:7

Konteks
1:7 Peninnah 6  would behave this way year after year. Whenever Hannah 7  went up to the Lord’s house, Peninnah 8  would upset her so that she would weep and refuse to eat.
Seret untuk mengatur ukuranSeret untuk mengatur ukuran

[37:35]  1 tn Heb “arose, stood”; which here suggests that they stood by him in his time of grief.

[37:35]  2 tn Heb “and he said, ‘Indeed I will go down to my son mourning to Sheol.’” Sheol was viewed as the place where departed spirits went after death.

[37:35]  3 tn Heb “his”; the referent (Joseph) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[37:1]  4 tn Heb “the land of the sojournings of his father.”

[37:1]  5 sn The next section begins with the heading This is the account of Jacob in Gen 37:2, so this verse actually forms part of the preceding section as a concluding contrast with Esau and his people. In contrast to all the settled and expanded population of Esau, Jacob was still moving about in the land without a permanent residence and without kings. Even if the Edomite king list was added later (as the reference to kings in Israel suggests), its placement here in contrast to Jacob and his descendants is important. Certainly the text deals with Esau before dealing with Jacob – that is the pattern. But the detail is so great in chap. 36 that the contrast cannot be missed.

[1:7]  6 tn The MT has a masculine form of the verb here יַעֲשֶׂה (yaaseh, “he used to do”); the subject in that case would presumably be Elkanah. But this leads to an abrupt change of subject in the following part of the verse, where the subject is the rival wife who caused Hannah anxiety. In light of v. 6 one expects the statement of v. 7 to refer to the ongoing actions of the rival wife: “she used to behave in this way year after year.” Some scholars have proposed retaining the masculine form but changing the vocalization of the verb so as to read a Niphal rather than a Qal (i.e., יֵעֲשֶׂה, yeaseh, “so it used to be done”). But the problem here is lack of precedent for such a use of the Niphal of this verb. It seems best in light of the context to understand the reference to be to Hannah’s rival Peninnah and to read here, with the Syriac Peshitta, a feminine form of the verb (“she used to do”). In the translation the referent (Peninnah) has been specified for clarity.

[1:7]  7 tn Heb “she”; the referent (Hannah) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[1:7]  8 tn Heb “she”; the referent (Peninnah) has been specified in the translation for clarity.



TIP #34: Tip apa yang ingin Anda lihat di sini? Beritahu kami dengan klik "Laporan Masalah/Saran" di bagian bawah halaman. [SEMUA]
dibuat dalam 0.03 detik
dipersembahkan oleh YLSA