Pengkhotbah 2:15

2:15 So I thought to myself, “The fate of the fool will happen even to me! ¹ 

Then what did I gain by becoming so excessively ²  wise?” ³ 

So I lamented to myself, ⁴ 

“The benefits of wisdom ⁵  are ultimately ⁶  meaningless!”

Pengkhotbah 3:17

3:17 I thought to myself, “God will judge both the righteous and the wicked;

for there is an appropriate time for every activity,

and there is a time of judgment ⁷  for every deed.

Pengkhotbah 5:16

5:16 This is another misfortune: ⁸ 

Just as he came, so will he go.

What did he gain from toiling for the wind?

Pengkhotbah 6:10

The Futile Way Life Works

6:10 Whatever has happened was foreordained, ⁹ 

and what happens to a person ¹⁰  was also foreknown.

It is useless for him to argue with God about his fate

because God is more powerful than he is. ¹¹ 

Pengkhotbah 7:15

Exceptions to the Law of Retribution

7:15 During the days of my fleeting life ¹²  I have seen both ¹³  of these things:

Sometimes ¹⁴  a righteous person dies prematurely ¹⁵  in spite of ¹⁶  his righteousness,

and sometimes ¹⁷  a wicked person lives long ¹⁸  in spite of his evil deeds.

Pengkhotbah 10:20

10:20 Do not curse a king even in your thoughts,

and do not curse the rich ¹⁹  while in your bedroom; ²⁰ 

for a bird ²¹  might report what you are thinking, ²² 

or some winged creature ²³  might repeat your ²⁴  words. ²⁵ 

Pengkhotbah 11:8

11:8 So, if a man lives many years, let him rejoice in them all,

but let him remember that the days of darkness ²⁶  will be many – all that is about to come is obscure. ²⁷ 

[2:15]  ¹ tn The emphatic use of the 1st person common singular personal pronoun אֲנִי (’ani, “me”) with the emphatic particle of association גַּם (gam, “even, as well as”; HALOT 195–96 s.v. גַּם) appears to emphasize the 1st person common singular suffix on יִקְרֵנִי (yiqreni) “it will befall [or “happen to”] me” (Qal imperfect 3rd person masculine singular + 1st person common singular suffix from קָרָה, qarah, “to befall; to happen to”); see GKC 438 §135.e. Qoheleth laments not that the fate of the wise man is the same as that of the fool, but that even he himself – the wisest man of all – would fare no better in the end than the most foolish.

[2:15]  ² tn The adjective יוֹתֵר (yoter) means “too much; excessive,” e.g., 7:16 “excessively righteous” (HALOT 404 s.v. יוֹתֵר 2; BDB 452 s.v. יוֹתֵר). It is derived from the root יֶתֶר (yeter, “what is left over”); see HALOT 452 s.v. I יֶתֶר. It is related to the verbal root יתר (Niphal “to be left over”; Hiphil “to have left over”); see HALOT 451–52 s.v. I יתר. The adjective is related to יִתְרוֹן (yitron, “advantage; profit”) which is a key-term in this section, creating a word-play: The wise man has a relative “advantage” (יִתְרוֹן) over the fool (2:13-14a); however, there is no ultimate advantage because both share the same fate, i.e., death (2:14b-15a). Thus, Qoheleth’s acquisition of tremendous wisdom (1:16; 2:9) was “excessive” because it exceeded its relative advantage over folly: it could not deliver him from the same fate as the fool. He had striven to obtain wisdom, yet it held no ultimate advantage.

[2:15]  ³ tn Heb “And why was I wise (to) excess?” The rhetorical question is an example of negative affirmation, expecting a negative answer: “I gained nothing!” (E. W. Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 949).

[2:15]  ⁴ tn Heb “So I said in my heart.”

[2:15]  ⁵ tn Heb “and also this,” referring to the relative advantage of wisdom over folly.

[2:15]  ⁶ tn The word “ultimately” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.

[3:17]  ⁷ tn The phrase “a time of judgment” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.

[5:16]  ⁸ tn See the note on the phrase “depressing misfortune” in v. 13.

[6:10]  ⁹ tn Heb “already its name was called.”

[6:10]  ¹⁰ tn Or “and what a person (Heb “man”) is was foreknown.”

[6:10]  ¹¹ tn Heb “he cannot contend with the one who is more powerful than him.” The referent of the “the one who is more powerful than he is” (God) has been specified in the translation for clarity. The words “with God about his fate” have been added for clarity as well.

[7:15]  ¹² tn The word “life” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for smoothness and clarity.

[7:15]  ¹³ tn As is the case throughout Ecclesiastes, the term הַכֹּל (hakkol) should be nuanced “both” rather than “all.”

[7:15]  ¹⁴ tn Heb “There is.” The term יֵשׁ (yesh, “there is”) is often used in aphorisms to assert the existence of a particular situation that occurs sometimes. It may indicate that the situation is not the rule but that it does occur on occasion, and may be nuanced “sometimes” (Prov 11:24; 13:7, 23; 14:12; 16:25; 18:24; 20:15; Eccl 2:21; 4:8; 5:12; 6:1; 7:15 [2x]; 8:14 [3x]).

[7:15]  ¹⁵ tn Heb “perishes.”

[7:15]  ¹⁶ tn Or “in his righteousness.” The preposition בְּ (bet) on the terms בְּצִרְקוֹ (bÿtsirqo, “his righteousness”) and בְּרָעָתוֹ (bÿra’ato, “his evil-doing”) in the following line are traditionally taken in a locative sense: “in his righteousness” and “in his wickedness” (KJV, NASB, NIV). However, it is better to take the בְּ (bet) in the adversative sense “in spite of” (e.g., Lev 26:27; Num 14:11; Deut 1:32; Isa 5:25; 9:11, 16, 20; 10:4; 16:14; 47:9; Pss 27:3; 78:32; Ezra 3:3); cf. HALOT 104 s.v. בְּ 7; BDB 90 s.v. בְּ 3.7. NJPS renders it well: “Sometimes a good man perishes in spite of his goodness, and sometimes a wicked one endures in spite of his wickedness.” In a similar vein, D. R. Glenn (“Ecclesiastes,” BKCOT, 993–94) writes: “The word ‘in’ in the phrases ‘in his righteousness’ and ‘in his wickedness’ can here mean ‘in spite of.’ These phrases…argue against the common view that in 7:16 Solomon was warning against legalistic or Pharisaic self-righteousness. Such would have been a sin and would have been so acknowledged by Solomon who was concerned about true exceptions to the doctrine of retribution, not supposed ones (cf. 8:10–14 where this doctrine is discussed again).”

[7:15]  ¹⁷ tn Heb “There is.” The term יֵשׁ (yesh,“there is”) is often used in aphorisms to assert the existence of a particular situation that occurs sometimes. It may indicate that the situation is not the rule but that it does occur on occasion, and may be nuanced “sometimes” (Prov 11:24; 13:7, 23; 14:12; 16:25; 18:24; 20:15; Eccl 2:21; 4:8; 5:12; 6:1; 7:15 [2x]; 8:14 [3x]).

[7:15]  ¹⁸ tn Heb “a wicked man endures.”

[10:20]  ¹⁹ tn Perhaps the referent is people who are in authority because of their wealth.

[10:20]  ²⁰ tn Heb “in chambers of your bedroom.”

[10:20]  ²¹ tn Heb “a bird of the air.”

[10:20]  ²² tn Heb “might carry the voice.” The article is used here with the force of a possessive pronoun.

[10:20]  ²³ tn The Hebrew phrase בַּעַל הַכְּנָפַיִם (ba’al hakkÿnafayim, “possessor of wings”) is an idiom for a winged creature, that is, a bird (e.g., Prov 1:17; see HALOT 143 s.v. בַּעַל A.6; BDB 127 s.v. בַּעַל 5.a). The term בַּעַל (“master; possessor”) is the construct governing the attributive genitive הַכְּנָפַיִם (“wings”); see IBHS 149-51 §9.5.3b.

[10:20]  ²⁴ tn The term “your” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for smoothness.

[10:20]  ²⁵ tn Heb “tell the matter.”

[11:8]  ²⁶ tn The phrase “the days of darkness” refers to the onset of old age (Eccl 12:1-5) and the inevitable experience of death (Eccl 11:7-8; 12:6-7). Elsewhere, “darkness” is a figure of speech (metonymy of association) for death (Job 10:21-22; 17:13; 18:18).

[11:8]  ²⁷ tn The term הֶבֶל (hevel) here means “obscure,” that is, unknown. This sense is derived from the literal concept of breath, vapor or wind that cannot be seen; thus, the idea of “obscure; dark; difficult to understand; enigmatic” (see HALOT 236–37 s.v. I הֶבֶל; BDB 210–11 s.v. I הֶבֶל). It is used in this sense in reference to enigmas in life (6:2; 8:10, 14) and the future which is obscure (11:8).