Pengkhotbah 2:9

2:9 So ¹  I was far wealthier ²  than all my predecessors in Jerusalem,

yet I maintained my objectivity: ³ 

Pengkhotbah 2:12

Wisdom is Better than Folly

2:12 Next, I decided to consider ⁴  wisdom, as well as foolish behavior and ideas. ⁵ 

For what more can the king’s successor do than what the king ⁶  has already done?

Pengkhotbah 2:15

2:15 So I thought to myself, “The fate of the fool will happen even to me! ⁷ 

Then what did I gain by becoming so excessively ⁸  wise?” ⁹ 

So I lamented to myself, ¹⁰ 

“The benefits of wisdom ¹¹  are ultimately ¹²  meaningless!”

Pengkhotbah 3:17

3:17 I thought to myself, “God will judge both the righteous and the wicked;

for there is an appropriate time for every activity,

and there is a time of judgment ¹³  for every deed.

Pengkhotbah 7:2

7:2 It is better to go to a funeral ¹⁴ 

than a feast. ¹⁵ 

For death ¹⁶  is the destiny ¹⁷  of every person, ¹⁸ 

and the living should ¹⁹  take this ²⁰  to heart.

Pengkhotbah 9:10

9:10 Whatever you find to do with your hands, ²¹ 

do it with all your might,

because there is neither work nor planning nor knowledge nor wisdom in the grave, ²² 

the place where you will eventually go. ²³ 

[2:9]  ¹ tn The vav prefixed to וְגָדַלְתִּי (vÿgadalti, vav + Qal perfect first common singular from גָּדַל, gadal, “to be great; to increase”) functions in a final summarizing sense, that is, it introduces the concluding summary of 2:4-9.

[2:9]  ² tn Heb “I became great and I surpassed” (וְהוֹסַפְתִּי וְגָדַלְתִּי, vÿgadalti vÿhosafti). This is a verbal hendiadys in which the second verb functions adverbially, modifying the first: “I became far greater.” Most translations miss the hendiadys and render the line in a woodenly literal sense (KJV, ASV, RSV, NEB, NRSV, NAB, NASB, MLB, Moffatt), while only a few recognize the presence of hendiadys here: “I became greater by far” (NIV) and “I gained more” (NJPS).

[2:9]  ³ tn Heb “yet my wisdom stood for me,” meaning he retained his wise perspective despite his great wealth.

[2:12]  ⁴ tn Heb “and I turned to see.”

[2:12]  ⁵ sn See 1:17 for the same expression. Throughout 2:1-11, Qoheleth evaluated the merits of merrymaking (2:1-3), accomplishing grand things (2:4-6), amassing great wealth (2:7-8), and secular acquisitions and accomplishments (2:9-10). Now, he reflects on the benefit in life in living wisely and not giving oneself over to frivolous self-indulgence.

[2:12]  ⁶ tc The Hebrew text reads עָשׂוּהוּ (’asuhu, “they have done it”; Qal perfect 3rd person masculine plural from עָשַׂה [’asah] + 3rd person masculine singular suffix). However, many medieval Hebrew mss read עָשָׂהוּ (’asahu, “he has done”; Qal perfect 3rd person masculine singular from עָשַׂה), reflected in the LXX and Syriac. The error was caused by dittography (ו, vav, written twice) or by orthographic confusion between ו and ה (hey) in הוו (confused as והוו) at the end of 2:12 and beginning of 2:13. The 3rd person masculine singular referent of עָשׂוּהוּ “what he has done” is the king, that is, Qoheleth himself. The referent (the king) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[2:15]  ⁷ tn The emphatic use of the 1st person common singular personal pronoun אֲנִי (’ani, “me”) with the emphatic particle of association גַּם (gam, “even, as well as”; HALOT 195–96 s.v. גַּם) appears to emphasize the 1st person common singular suffix on יִקְרֵנִי (yiqreni) “it will befall [or “happen to”] me” (Qal imperfect 3rd person masculine singular + 1st person common singular suffix from קָרָה, qarah, “to befall; to happen to”); see GKC 438 §135.e. Qoheleth laments not that the fate of the wise man is the same as that of the fool, but that even he himself – the wisest man of all – would fare no better in the end than the most foolish.

[2:15]  ⁸ tn The adjective יוֹתֵר (yoter) means “too much; excessive,” e.g., 7:16 “excessively righteous” (HALOT 404 s.v. יוֹתֵר 2; BDB 452 s.v. יוֹתֵר). It is derived from the root יֶתֶר (yeter, “what is left over”); see HALOT 452 s.v. I יֶתֶר. It is related to the verbal root יתר (Niphal “to be left over”; Hiphil “to have left over”); see HALOT 451–52 s.v. I יתר. The adjective is related to יִתְרוֹן (yitron, “advantage; profit”) which is a key-term in this section, creating a word-play: The wise man has a relative “advantage” (יִתְרוֹן) over the fool (2:13-14a); however, there is no ultimate advantage because both share the same fate, i.e., death (2:14b-15a). Thus, Qoheleth’s acquisition of tremendous wisdom (1:16; 2:9) was “excessive” because it exceeded its relative advantage over folly: it could not deliver him from the same fate as the fool. He had striven to obtain wisdom, yet it held no ultimate advantage.

[2:15]  ⁹ tn Heb “And why was I wise (to) excess?” The rhetorical question is an example of negative affirmation, expecting a negative answer: “I gained nothing!” (E. W. Bullinger, Figures of Speech, 949).

[2:15]  ¹⁰ tn Heb “So I said in my heart.”

[2:15]  ¹¹ tn Heb “and also this,” referring to the relative advantage of wisdom over folly.

[2:15]  ¹² tn The word “ultimately” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.

[3:17]  ¹³ tn The phrase “a time of judgment” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for clarity.

[7:2]  ¹⁴ tn Heb “house of mourning.” The phrase refers to a funeral where the deceased is mourned.

[7:2]  ¹⁵ tn Heb “house of drinking”; or “house of feasting.” The Hebrew noun מִשְׁתֶּה (mishteh) can denote (1) “feast; banquet,” occasion for drinking-bouts (1 Sam 25:36; Isa 5:12; Jer 51:39; Job 1:5; Esth 2:18; 5:14; 8:17; 9:19) or (2) “drink” (exilic/postexilic – Ezra 3:7; Dan 1:5, 8, 16); see HALOT 653 s.v. מִשְׁתֶּה 4; BDB 1059 s.v. שָׁתַה.

[7:2]  sn Qoheleth recommended that people soberly reflect on the brevity of life and the reality of death (It is better to go to a house of mourning) than to waste one’s life in the foolish pursuit of pleasure (than to go to a house of banqueting). Sober reflection on the brevity of life and reality of death has more moral benefit than frivolous levity.

[7:2]  ¹⁶ tn Heb “it”; the referent (“death”) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[7:2]  ¹⁷ tn Heb “the end.” The noun סוֹף (sof) literally means “end; conclusion” (HALOT 747 s.v. סוֹף 1; BDB 693 s.v. סוֹף). It is used in this context in reference to death, as the preceding phrase “house of mourning” (i.e., funeral) suggests.

[7:2]  ¹⁸ tn Heb “all men” or “every man.”

[7:2]  ¹⁹ tn The imperfect tense verb יִתֵּן, yitten (from נָתָן, natan, “to give”) functions in a modal sense, denoting obligation, that is, the subject’s obligatory or necessary conduct: “should” or “ought to” (see R. J. Williams, Hebrew Syntax, 31-32, §172; IBHS 508-9 §31.4g).

[7:2]  ²⁰ tn The word “this” does not appear in the Hebrew text, but is supplied in the translation for smoothness.

[9:10]  ²¹ tn Heb “Whatever your hand finds to do.”

[9:10]  ²² tn Heb “Sheol.”

[9:10]  ²³ tn Or “where you are about to go.”