TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Roma 9:22

Konteks
9:22 But what if God, willing to demonstrate his wrath and to make known his power, has endured with much patience the objects¹ of wrath² prepared for destruction?³

Mazmur 90:11

Konteks

90:11 Who can really fathom the intensity of your anger?⁴

Your raging fury causes people to fear you.⁵

Nahum 1:6

Konteks

1:6 No one can withstand⁶ his indignation!⁷

No one can resist⁸ his fierce anger!⁹

His wrath is poured out like volcanic fire,

boulders are broken up¹⁰ as he approaches.¹¹

Ibrani 10:27

Konteks
10:27 but only a certain fearful expectation of judgment and a fury¹² of fire that will consume God’s enemies.¹³

Wahyu 14:10

Konteks
14:10 that person¹⁴ will also drink of the wine of God’s anger¹⁵ that has been mixed undiluted in the cup of his wrath, and he will be tortured with fire and sulfur¹⁶ in front of the holy angels and in front of the Lamb.

Wahyu 16:19

Konteks
16:19 The¹⁷ great city was split into three parts and the cities of the nations¹⁸ collapsed.¹⁹ So²⁰ Babylon the great was remembered before God, and was given the cup²¹ filled with the wine made of God’s furious wrath.²²

[9:22] ¹tn Grk “vessels.” This is the same Greek word used in v. 21.

[9:22] ²tn Or “vessels destined for wrath.” The genitive ὀργῆς (orghs) could be taken as a genitive of destination.

[9:22] ³tn Or possibly “objects of wrath that have fit themselves for destruction.” The form of the participle could be taken either as a passive or middle (reflexive). ExSyn 417-18 argues strongly for the passive sense (which is followed in the translation), stating that “the middle view has little to commend it.” First, καταρτίζω (katartizw) is nowhere else used in the NT as a direct or reflexive middle (a usage which, in any event, is quite rare in the NT). Second, the lexical force of this verb, coupled with the perfect tense, suggests something of a “done deal” (against some commentaries that see these vessels as ready for destruction yet still able to avert disaster). Third, the potter-clay motif seems to have one point: The potter prepares the clay.

[90:11] ⁴tn Heb “Who knows the strength of your anger?”

[90:11] ⁵tn Heb “and like your fear [is] your raging fury.” Perhaps one should emend וּכְיִרְאָתְךְ (ukhyir’otekh, “and like your fear”) to יִרְאָתְךְ (yir’otkh, “your fear”), understanding a virtual dittography (אַפֶּךָ וּכְיִרְאָתְךְ, ’apekha ukhyir’otekh) to have occurred. In this case the psalmist asserts “your fear [is] your raging fury,” that is, your raging fury is what causes others to fear you. The suffix on “fear” is understood as objective.

[1:6] ⁶tn Heb “stand before” (so KJV, NASB, NRSV, NLT). The Hebrew verb עָמַד (’amad, “stand”) here denotes “to resist, withstand.” It is used elsewhere of warriors taking a stand in battle to hold their ground against enemies (Judg 2:14; Josh 10:8; 21:44; 23:9; 2 Kgs 10:4; Dan 11:16; Amos 2:15). It is also used of people trying to protect their lives from enemy attack (Esth 8:11; 9:16). Like a mighty warrior, the Lord will attack his enemies, but none will be able to make a stand against him; none will be able to hold their ground against him; and none will be able to protect themselves from his onslaught (Pss 76:7[8]; 147:17; Mal 3:2).

[1:6] ⁷tn Heb “Who can stand before his indignation?” The rhetorical question expects a negative answer; it is translated here as an emphatic denial. The Hebrew noun זַעַם (za’am, “indignation, curse”) connotes the angry wrath or indignant curse of God (Isa 10:5, 25; 13:5; 26:20; 30:27; Jer 10:10; 15:17; 50:25; Ezek 21:36; 22:24, 31; Hab 3:12; Zeph 3:8; Pss 38:4; 69:25; 78:49; 102:11; Lam 2:6; Dan 8:19; 11:36). It depicts anger expressed in the form of punishment (HALOT 276 s.v.; TWOT 1:247).

[1:6] ⁸tn Heb “Who can rise up against…?” The verb יָקוּם (yaqum, “arise”) is here a figurative expression connoting resistance. Although the adversative sense of בְּ (bet) with יָקוּם (yaqum, “against him”) is attested, denoting hostile action taken against one’s enemy (Mic 7:6; Ps 27:12), the locative sense (“before him”) is preferred due to the parallelism with לִפְנֵי (lifney, “before him”).

[1:6] ⁹tn Heb “Who can rise up against the heat of his anger?” The rhetorical question expects a negative answer which is translated as an emphatic denial to clarify the point.

[1:6] ¹⁰tn Or “burst into flames.” The Niphal perfect נִתְּצוּ (nittÿtsu) from נָתַץ (natats, “to break up, throw down”) may denote “are broken up” or “are thrown down.” The BHS editors suggest emending the MT’s נִתְּצוּ (nittÿtsu) to נִצְּתּוּ (nitsÿtu, Niphal perfect from יָצַת [yatsat, “to burn, to kindle, to burst into flames”]): “boulders burst into flames.” This merely involves the simple transposition of the second and third consonants. This emendation is supported by a few Hebrew mss (cited in BHS apparatus). It is supported contextually by fire and heat motifs in 1:5-6. The same metathesis of נִתְּצוּ and נִצְּתּוּ occurs in Jer 4:26.

[1:6] ¹¹tn Heb “before him” (so NAB, NIV, TEV).

[10:27] ¹²tn Grk “zeal,” recalling God’s jealous protection of his holiness and honor (cf. Exod 20:5).

[10:27] sn An allusion to Zeph 1:18.

[10:27] ¹³tn Grk “the enemies.”

[10:27] sn An allusion to Isa 26:11.

[14:10] ¹⁴tn Grk “he himself.”

[14:10] ¹⁵tn The Greek word for “anger” here is θυμός (qumos), a wordplay on the “passion” (θυμός) of the personified city of Babylon in 14:8.

[14:10] ¹⁶tn Traditionally, “brimstone.”

[16:19] ¹⁷tn Here καί (kai) has not been translated because of differences between Greek and English style.

[16:19] ¹⁸tn Or “of the Gentiles” (the same Greek word may be translated “Gentiles” or “nations”).

[16:19] ¹⁹tn Grk “fell.”

[16:19] ²⁰tn Here καί (kai) has been translated as “so” to indicate the implied result of Babylon’s misdeeds (see Rev 14:8).

[16:19] ²¹tn Grk “the cup of the wine of the anger of the wrath of him.” The concatenation of four genitives has been rendered somewhat differently by various translations (see the note on the word “wrath”).