TB NETBible YUN-IBR Ref. Silang Nama Gambar Himne

Rut 1:11

Konteks

1:11 But Naomi replied, “Go back home, my daughters! There is no reason for you to return to Judah with me! 1  I am no longer capable of giving birth to sons who might become your husbands! 2 

Rut 2:18

Konteks
Ruth Returns to Naomi

2:18 She carried it back to town, and her mother-in-law saw 3  how much grain 4  she had gathered. Then Ruth 5  gave her the roasted grain she had saved from mealtime. 6 

Rut 3:2

Konteks
3:2 Now Boaz, with whose female servants you worked, is our close relative. 7  Look, tonight he is winnowing barley at the threshing floor. 8 
Seret untuk mengatur ukuranSeret untuk mengatur ukuran

[1:11]  1 tn Heb “Why would you want to come with me?” Naomi’s rhetorical question expects a negative answer. The phrase “to Judah” is added in the translation for clarification.

[1:11]  2 tn Heb “Do I still have sons in my inner parts that they might become your husbands?” Again Naomi’s rhetorical question expects a negative answer.

[2:18]  3 tc MT vocalizes ותרא as the Qal verb וַתֵּרֶא (vattere’, “and she saw”), consequently of “her mother-in-law” as subject and “what she gathered” as the direct object: “her mother-in-law saw what she gathered.” A few medieval Hebrew mss (also reflected in Syriac and Vulgate) have the Hiphil וַתַּרְא (vattar’, “and she showed”), consequently taking “her mother-in-law” as the direct object and “what she gathered” as the double direct-object: “she showed her mother-in-law what she had gathered” (cf. NAB, TEV, CEV, NLT). Although the latter has the advantage of making Ruth the subject of all the verbs in this verse, it would be syntactically difficult. For one would expect the accusative sign אֶת (’et) before “her mother-in-law” if it were the direct object of a Hiphil verb in a sentence with a double direct object introduced by the accusative sign אֶת, e.g., “to show (Hiphil of רָאָה, raah) your servant (direct object marked by accusative sign אֶת) your greatness (double direct object marked by accusative sign אֶת) (Deut 3:24). Therefore the MT reading is preferred.

[2:18]  4 tn Heb “that which”; the referent (how much grain) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[2:18]  5 tn Heb “she”; the referent (Ruth) has been specified in the translation for clarity.

[2:18]  6 tn Heb “and she brought out and gave to her that which she had left over from her being satisfied.”

[3:2]  7 tn Heb “Is not Boaz our close relative, with whose female servants you were?” The idiomatic, negated rhetorical question is equivalent to an affirmation (see Ruth 2:8-9; 3:1) and has thus been translated in the affirmative (so also NCV, NRSV, TEV, CEV, NLT).

[3:2]  8 tn Heb “look, he is winnowing the barley threshing floor tonight.”

[3:2]  sn Winnowing the threshed grain involved separating the kernels of grain from the straw and chaff. The grain would be thrown into the air, allowing the wind to separate the kernels (see O. Borowski, Agriculture in Iron Age Israel, 65-66). The threshing floor itself was usually located outside town in a place where the prevailing west wind could be used to advantage (Borowski, 62-63).



TIP #32: Gunakan Pencarian Khusus untuk melakukan pencarian Teks Alkitab, Tafsiran/Catatan, Studi Kamus, Ilustrasi, Artikel, Ref. Silang, Leksikon, Pertanyaan-Pertanyaan, Gambar, Himne, Topikal. Anda juga dapat mencari bahan-bahan yang berkaitan dengan ayat-ayat yang anda inginkan melalui pencarian Referensi Ayat. [SEMUA]
dibuat dalam 0.04 detik
dipersembahkan oleh YLSA