Efesus 2:13
Konteks2:13 But now in Christ Jesus you who used to be far away have been brought near by the blood of Christ. 1
Efesus 4:4
Konteks4:4 There is one body and one Spirit, just as you too were called to the one hope of your calling,
Efesus 4:7
Konteks4:7 But to each one of us grace was given according to the measure of the gift of Christ.
Efesus 4:9
Konteks4:9 Now what is the meaning of “he ascended,” except that he also descended 2 to the lower regions, 3 namely, the earth? 4
Efesus 4:30
Konteks4:30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption.
[2:13] 1 tn Or “have come near in the blood of Christ.”
[2:13] sn See the note on “his blood” in 1:7.
[4:9] 2 tc The majority of
[4:9] 3 tc The Western texttype (D* F G it) lacks the plural noun μέρη (merh, “regions”); the shorter reading cannot be dismissed out of hand since it is also supported by Ì46 (which often has strong affinities, however, with the Western text). The inclusion of the word has strong external support from important, early
[4:9] 4 tn Grk “to the lower parts of the earth.” This phrase has been variously interpreted: (1) The traditional view understands it as a reference to the underworld (hell), where Jesus is thought to have descended in the three days between his death and resurrection. In this case, “of the earth” would be a partitive genitive. (2) A second option is to translate the phrase “of the earth” as a genitive of apposition: “to the lower parts, namely, the earth” (as in the present translation). Many recent scholars hold this view and argue that it is a reference to the incarnation. (3) A third option, which also sees the phrase “of the earth” as a genitive of apposition, is that the descent in the passage occurs after the ascent rather than before it, and refers to the descent of the Spirit at Pentecost (cf. Acts 4:11-16). Support for this latter view is found in the intertestamental and rabbinic use of Ps 68:18 (quoted in v. 8), which is consistently and solely interpreted as a reference to Moses’ ascent of Mt. Sinai to “capture” the words of the law. The probability, therefore, is that the comments here in v. 9 reflect a polemic against the interpretation of Ps 68:18 in certain circles as a reference to Moses. See W. H. Harris, The Descent of Christ (AGJU 32), 46-54; 171-204.