Daniel 2:1-49
Konteks2:1 In the second year of his 1 reign Nebuchadnezzar had many dreams. 2 His mind 3 was disturbed and he suffered from insomnia. 4 2:2 The king issued an order 5 to summon the magicians, astrologers, sorcerers, and wise men 6 in order to explain his dreams to him. 7 So they came and awaited the king’s instructions. 8
2:3 The king told them, “I have had a dream, 9 and I 10 am anxious to understand the dream.” 2:4 The wise men replied to the king: [What follows is in Aramaic 11 ] “O king, live forever! Tell your servants the dream, and we will disclose its 12 interpretation.” 2:5 The king replied 13 to the wise men, “My decision is firm. 14 If you do not inform me of both the dream and its interpretation, you will be dismembered 15 and your homes reduced to rubble! 2:6 But if you can disclose the dream and its interpretation, you will receive from me gifts, a reward, and considerable honor. So disclose to me the dream and its interpretation!” 2:7 They again replied, “Let the king inform us 16 of the dream; then we will disclose its 17 interpretation.” 2:8 The king replied, “I know for sure that you are attempting to gain time, because you see that my decision is firm. 2:9 If you don’t inform me of the dream, there is only one thing that is going to happen to you. 18 For you have agreed among yourselves to report to me something false and deceitful 19 until such time as things might change. So tell me the dream, and I will have confidence 20 that you can disclose its interpretation.”
2:10 The wise men replied to the king, “There is no man on earth who is able to disclose the king’s secret, 21 for no king, regardless of his position and power, has ever requested such a thing from any magician, astrologer, or wise man. 2:11 What the king is asking is too difficult, and no one exists who can disclose it to the king, except for the gods – but they don’t live among mortals!” 22
2:12 Because of this the king got furiously angry 23 and gave orders to destroy all the wise men of Babylon. 2:13 So a decree went out, and the wise men were about 24 to be executed. They also sought 25 Daniel and his friends so that they could be executed.
2:14 Then Daniel spoke with prudent counsel 26 to Arioch, who was in charge of the king’s executioners and who had gone out to execute the wise men of Babylon. 2:15 He inquired of Arioch the king’s deputy, “Why is the decree from the king so urgent?” 27 Then Arioch informed Daniel about the matter. 2:16 So Daniel went in and 28 requested the king to grant him time, that he might disclose the interpretation to the king. 2:17 Then Daniel went to his home and informed his friends Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah of the matter. 2:18 He asked them to pray for mercy from the God of heaven concerning this mystery so that he 29 and his friends would not be destroyed along with the rest of the wise men of Babylon. 2:19 Then in a night vision the mystery was revealed to Daniel. So Daniel praised 30 the God of heaven, 2:20 saying, 31
“Let the name of God 32 be praised 33 forever and ever,
for wisdom and power belong to him.
2:21 He changes times and seasons,
deposing some kings
and establishing others. 34
He gives wisdom to the wise;
he imparts knowledge to those with understanding; 35
2:22 he reveals deep and hidden things.
He knows what is in the darkness,
and light resides with him.
2:23 O God of my fathers, I acknowledge and glorify you,
for you have bestowed wisdom and power on me.
Now you have enabled me to understand what I 36 requested from you.
For you have enabled me to understand the king’s dilemma.” 37
2:24 Then Daniel went in to see 38 Arioch (whom the king had appointed to destroy the wise men of Babylon). He came 39 and said to him, “Don’t destroy the wise men of Babylon! Escort me 40 to the king, and I will disclose the interpretation to him!” 41
2:25 So Arioch quickly ushered Daniel into the king’s presence, saying to him, “I 42 have found a man from the captives of Judah who can make known the interpretation to the king.” 2:26 The king then asked Daniel (whose name was also Belteshazzar), “Are you able to make known to me the dream that I saw, as well as its interpretation?” 2:27 Daniel replied to the king, “The mystery that the king is asking about is such that no wise men, astrologers, magicians, or diviners can possibly disclose it to the king. 2:28 However, there is a God in heaven who reveals mysteries, 43 and he has made known to King Nebuchadnezzar what will happen in the times to come. 44 The dream and the visions you had while lying on your bed 45 are as follows.
2:29 “As for you, O king, while you were in your bed your thoughts turned to future things. 46 The revealer of mysteries has made known to you what will take place. 2:30 As for me, this mystery was revealed to me not because I possess more wisdom 47 than any other living person, but so that the king may understand 48 the interpretation and comprehend the thoughts of your mind. 49
2:31 “You, O king, were watching as a great statue – one 50 of impressive size and extraordinary brightness – was standing before you. Its appearance caused alarm. 2:32 As for that statue, its head was of fine gold, its chest and arms were of silver, its belly and thighs were of bronze. 2:33 Its legs were of iron; its feet were partly of iron and partly of clay. 51 2:34 You were watching as 52 a stone was cut out, 53 but not by human hands. It struck the statue on its iron and clay feet, breaking them in pieces. 2:35 Then the iron, clay, bronze, silver, and gold were broken in pieces without distinction 54 and became like chaff from the summer threshing floors that the wind carries away. Not a trace of them could be found. But the stone that struck the statue became a large mountain that filled the entire earth. 2:36 This was the dream. Now we 55 will set forth before the king its interpretation.
2:37 “You, O king, are the king of kings. The God of heaven has granted you sovereignty, power, strength, and honor. 2:38 Wherever human beings, 56 wild animals, 57 and birds of the sky live – he has given them into your power. 58 He has given you authority over them all. You are the head of gold. 2:39 Now after you another kingdom 59 will arise, one inferior to yours. Then a third kingdom, one of bronze, will rule in all the earth. 2:40 Then there will be a fourth kingdom, one strong like iron. Just like iron breaks in pieces and shatters everything, and as iron breaks in pieces 60 all of these metals, 61 so it will break in pieces and crush the others. 62 2:41 In that you were seeing feet and toes 63 partly of wet clay 64 and partly of iron, so this will be a divided kingdom. Some of the strength of iron will be in it, for you saw iron mixed with wet clay. 65 2:42 In that the toes of the feet were partly of iron and partly of clay, the latter stages of this kingdom will be partly strong and partly fragile. 2:43 And 66 in that you saw iron mixed with wet clay, so people will be mixed 67 with one another 68 without adhering to one another, just as 69 iron does not mix with clay. 2:44 In the days of those kings the God of heaven will raise up an everlasting kingdom that will not be destroyed and a kingdom that will not be left to another people. It will break in pieces and bring about the demise of all these kingdoms. But it will stand forever. 2:45 You saw that a stone was cut from a mountain, but not by human hands; it smashed the iron, bronze, clay, silver, and gold into pieces. The great God has made known to the king what will occur in the future. 70 The dream is certain, and its interpretation is reliable.”
2:46 Then King Nebuchadnezzar bowed down with his face to the ground 71 and paid homage to Daniel. He gave orders to offer sacrifice and incense to him. 2:47 The king replied to Daniel, “Certainly your God is a God of gods and Lord of kings and revealer of mysteries, for you were able to reveal this mystery!” 2:48 Then the king elevated Daniel to high position and bestowed on him many marvelous gifts. He granted him authority over the entire province of Babylon and made him the main prefect over all the wise men of Babylon. 2:49 And at Daniel’s request, the king 72 appointed Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego over the administration of the province of Babylon. Daniel himself served in the king’s court. 73
Daniel 2:7
Konteks2:7 They again replied, “Let the king inform us 74 of the dream; then we will disclose its 75 interpretation.”
Daniel 1:1-21
Konteks1:1 In the third 76 year of the reign of King Jehoiakim of Judah, King Nebuchadnezzar 77 of Babylon advanced against Jerusalem 78 and laid it under siege. 79 1:2 Now the Lord 80 delivered 81 King Jehoiakim of Judah into his power, 82 along with some of the vessels 83 of the temple of God. 84 He brought them to the land of Babylonia 85 to the temple of his god 86 and put 87 the vessels in the treasury of his god.
1:3 The king commanded 88 Ashpenaz, 89 who was in charge of his court officials, 90 to choose 91 some of the Israelites who were of royal and noble descent 92 – 1:4 young men in whom there was no physical defect and who were handsome, 93 well versed in all kinds of wisdom, well educated 94 and having keen insight, 95 and who were capable 96 of entering the king’s royal service 97 – and to teach them the literature and language 98 of the Babylonians. 99 1:5 So the king assigned them a daily ration 100 from his royal delicacies 101 and from the wine he himself drank. They were to be trained 102 for the next three years. At the end of that time they were to enter the king’s service. 103 1:6 As it turned out, 104 among these young men 105 were some from Judah: 106 Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah. 107 1:7 But the overseer of the court officials renamed them. He gave 108 Daniel the name Belteshazzar, Hananiah he named Shadrach, Mishael he named Meshach, and Azariah he named Abednego. 109
1:8 But Daniel made up his mind 110 that he would not defile 111 himself with the royal delicacies or the royal wine. 112 He therefore asked the overseer of the court officials for permission not to defile himself. 1:9 Then God made the overseer of the court officials sympathetic to Daniel. 113 1:10 But he 114 responded to Daniel, “I fear my master the king. He is the one who has decided 115 your food and drink. What would happen if he saw that you looked malnourished in comparison to the other young men your age? 116 If that happened, 117 you would endanger my life 118 with the king!” 1:11 Daniel then spoke to the warden 119 whom the overseer of the court officials had appointed over Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah: 1:12 “Please test your servants for ten days by providing us with some vegetables to eat and water to drink. 1:13 Then compare our appearance 120 with that of 121 the young men who are eating the royal delicacies; 122 deal with us 123 in light of what you see.” 1:14 So the warden 124 agreed to their proposal 125 and tested them for ten 126 days.
1:15 At the end of the ten days their appearance was better and their bodies were healthier 127 than all the young men who had been eating the royal delicacies. 1:16 So the warden removed the delicacies and the wine 128 from their diet 129 and gave them a diet of vegetables instead. 1:17 Now as for these four young men, God endowed them with knowledge and skill in all sorts of literature and wisdom – and Daniel had insight into all kinds of visions and dreams.
1:18 When the time appointed by the king arrived, 130 the overseer of the court officials brought them into Nebuchadnezzar’s presence. 1:19 When the king spoke with them, he did not find among the entire group 131 anyone like Daniel, Hananiah, Mishael, or Azariah. So they entered the king’s service. 132 1:20 In every matter of wisdom and 133 insight the king asked them about, he found them to be ten times 134 better than any of the magicians and astrologers that were in his entire empire. 1:21 Now Daniel lived on until the first 135 year of Cyrus the king.
[2:1] 1 tn Heb “Nebuchadnezzar’s.” The possessive pronoun is substituted in the translation for stylistic reasons.
[2:1] 2 tn Heb “dreamed dreams.” The plural is used here and in v. 2, but the singular in v. 3. The plural “dreams” has been variously explained. Some interpreters take the plural as denoting an indefinite singular (so GKC 400 §124.o). But it may be that it is describing a stream of related dreams, or a dream state. In the latter case, one might translate: “Nebuchadnezzar was in a trance.” See further, J. A. Montgomery, Daniel (ICC), 142.
[2:1] 4 tn Heb “his sleep left (?) him.” The use of the verb הָיָה (hayah, “to be”) here is unusual. The context suggests a meaning such as “to be finished” or “gone.” Cf. Dan 8:27. Some scholars emend the verb to read נָדְדָה (nadÿdah, “fled”); cf. Dan 6:19. See further, DCH 2:540 s.v. היה I Ni.3; HALOT 244 s.v. היה nif; BDB 227-28 s.v. הָיָה Niph.2.
[2:2] 5 tn Heb “said.” So also in v. 12.
[2:2] 6 tn Heb “Chaldeans.” The term Chaldeans (Hebrew כַּשְׂדִּים, kasdim) is used in the book of Daniel both in an ethnic sense and, as here, to refer to a caste of Babylonian wise men and astrologers.
[2:2] 7 tn Heb “to explain to the king his dreams.”
[2:2] 8 tn Heb “stood before the king.”
[2:3] 9 tn Heb “I have dreamed a dream” (so KJV, ASV).
[2:4] 11 sn Contrary to common belief, the point here is not that the wise men (Chaldeans) replied to the king in the Aramaic language, or that this language was uniquely the language of the Chaldeans. It was this view that led in the past to Aramaic being referred to as “Chaldee.” Aramaic was used as a lingua franca during this period; its origins and usage were not restricted to the Babylonians. Rather, this phrase is better understood as an editorial note (cf. NAB) marking the fact that from 2:4b through 7:28 the language of the book shifts from Hebrew to Aramaic. In 8:1, and for the remainder of the book, the language returns to Hebrew. Various views have been advanced to account for this change of language, most of which are unconvincing. Most likely the change in language is a reflection of stages in the transmission history of the book of Daniel.
[2:5] 13 tn Aram “answered and said,” a common idiom to indicate a reply, but redundant in contemporary English.
[2:5] 14 tn It seems clear from what follows that Nebuchadnezzar clearly recalls the content of the dream, although obviously he does not know what to make of it. By not divulging the dream itself to the would-be interpreters, he intends to find out whether they are simply leading him on. If they can tell him the dream’s content, which he is able to verify, he then can have confidence in their interpretation, which is what eludes him. The translation “the matter is gone from me” (cf. KJV, ASV), suggesting that the king had simply forgotten the dream, is incorrect. The Aramaic word used here (אַזְדָּא, ’azda’) is probably of Persian origin; it occurs in the OT only here and in v. 8. There are two main possibilities for the meaning of the word: “the matter is promulgated by me” (see KBL 1048 s.v.) and therefore “publicly known” (cf. NRSV; F. Rosenthal, Grammar, 62-63, §189), or “the matter is irrevocable” (cf. NAB, NIV, TEV, CEV, NLT; HALOT 1808 s.v. אזד; cf. also BDB 1079 s.v.). The present translation reflects this latter option. See further E. Vogt, Lexicon linguae aramaicae, 3.
[2:5] 15 tn Aram “made limbs.” Cf. 3:29.
[2:7] 16 tn Aram “his servants.”
[2:9] 18 tn Aram “one is your law,” i.e., only one thing is applicable to you.
[2:9] 19 tn Aram “a lying and corrupt word.”
[2:9] 20 tn Aram “I will know.”
[2:10] 21 tn Aram “matter, thing.”
[2:11] 22 tn Aram “whose dwelling is not with flesh.”
[2:12] 23 tn Aram “was angry and very furious.” The expression is a hendiadys (two words or phrases expressing a single idea).
[2:13] 24 tn The Aramaic participle is used here to express the imminent future.
[2:13] 25 tn The impersonal active plural (“they sought”) of the Aramaic verb could also be translated as an English passive: “Daniel and his friends were sought” (cf. NAB).
[2:14] 26 tn Aram “returned prudence and counsel.” The expression is a hendiadys.
[2:15] 27 tn The Aramaic word מְהַחְצְפָה (mÿhakhtsÿfah) may refer to the severity of the king’s decree (i.e., “harsh”; so HALOT 1879 s.v. חצף; BDB 1093 s.v. חֲצַף), although it would seem that in a delicate situation such as this Daniel would avoid this kind of criticism of the king’s actions. The translation above understands the word to refer to the immediacy, not harshness, of the decree. See further, F. Rosenthal, Grammar, 50, §116; E. Vogt, Lexicon linguae aramaicae, 67.
[2:16] 28 tc Theodotion and the Syriac lack the words “went in and.”
[2:18] 29 tn Aram “Daniel.” The proper name is redundant here in English, and has not been included in the translation.
[2:20] 31 tn Aram “Daniel answered and said.”
[2:20] 32 sn As is often the case in the Bible, here the name represents the person.
[2:21] 35 tn Aram “the knowers of understanding.”
[2:23] 36 tn Aram “we.” Various explanations have been offered for the plural, but it is probably best understood as the editorial plural; so also with “me” later in this verse.
[2:23] 37 tn Aram “the word of the king.”
[2:24] 38 tc The MT has עַל עַל (’al ’al, “he entered upon”). Several medieval Hebrew
[2:24] 39 tc The LXX and Vulgate, along with one medieval Hebrew
[2:24] 40 tn Aram “cause me to enter.” So also in v. 25.
[2:25] 42 sn Arioch’s claim is self-serving and exaggerated. It is Daniel who came to him, and not the other way around. By claiming to have found one capable of solving the king’s dilemma, Arioch probably hoped to ingratiate himself to the king.
[2:28] 43 tn Aram “a revealer of mysteries.” The phrase serves as a quasi-title for God in Daniel.
[2:28] 44 tn Aram “in the latter days.”
[2:28] 45 tn Aram “your dream and the visions of your head upon your bed.”
[2:29] 46 tn Aram “your thoughts upon your bed went up to what will be after this.”
[2:30] 47 tn Aram “not for any wisdom which is in me more than [in] any living man.”
[2:30] 48 tn Aram “they might cause the king to know.” The impersonal plural is used here to refer to the role of God’s spirit in revealing the dream and its interpretation to the king. As J. A. Montgomery says, “it appropriately here veils the mysterious agency” (Daniel [ICC], 164-65).
[2:33] 51 sn Clay refers to baked clay, which – though hard – was also fragile. Cf. the reference in v. 41 to “wet clay.”
[2:34] 53 tc The LXX, Theodotion, and the Vulgate have “from a mountain,” though this is probably a harmonization with v. 45.
[2:35] 54 tn Aram “as one.” For the meaning “without distinction” see the following: F. Rosenthal, Grammar, 36, §64, and p. 93; E. Vogt, Lexicon linguae aramaicae, 60.
[2:36] 55 tn Various suggestions have been made concerning the plural “we.” It is probably the editorial plural and could be translated here as “I.”
[2:38] 56 tn Aram “the sons of man.”
[2:38] 57 tn Aram “the beasts of the field.”
[2:39] 59 sn The identity of the first kingdom is clearly Babylon. The identification of the following three kingdoms is disputed. The common view is that they represent Media, Persia, and Greece. Most conservative scholars identify them as Media-Persia, Greece, and Rome.
[2:40] 60 tc Theodotion and the Vulgate lack the phrase “and as iron breaks in pieces.”
[2:40] 61 tn The Aramaic text does not have this word, but it has been added in the translation for clarity.
[2:40] 62 tn The words “the others” are supplied from the context.
[2:41] 63 tc The LXX lacks “and toes.”
[2:41] 64 tn Aram “potter’s clay.”
[2:41] 65 tn Aram “clay of clay” (also in v. 43).
[2:43] 66 tc The present translation reads the conjunction, with most medieval Hebrew
[2:43] 67 sn The reference to people being mixed is usually understood to refer to intermarriage.
[2:43] 68 tn Aram “with the seed of men.”
[2:43] 69 tc The present translation reads הֵיךְ דִּי (hekh diy) rather than the MT הֵא־כְדִי (he’-khÿdi). It is a case of wrong word division.
[2:45] 70 tn Aram “after this.”
[2:46] 71 tn Aram “fell on his face.”
[2:49] 72 tn Aram “and Daniel sought from the king and he appointed.”
[2:49] 73 tn Aram “was at the gate of the king.”
[2:7] 74 tn Aram “his servants.”
[1:1] 76 sn The third year of the reign of Jehoiakim would be ca. 605
[1:1] 77 sn King Nebuchadnezzar ruled Babylon from ca. 605-562
[1:1] 78 map For location see Map5 B1; Map6 F3; Map7 E2; Map8 F2; Map10 B3; JP1 F4; JP2 F4; JP3 F4; JP4 F4.
[1:1] 79 sn This attack culminated in the first of three major deportations of Jews to Babylon. The second one occurred in 597
[1:2] 80 tn The Hebrew term translated “Lord” here is אֲדֹנָי (’adonay).
[1:2] 82 tn Heb “hand,” which is often used idiomatically for one’s power and authority. See BDB 390 s.v. יָד 2.
[1:2] 83 tn Or “utensils”; or “articles.”
[1:2] 84 tn Heb “house of God.”
[1:2] 85 sn The land of Babylonia (Heb “the land of Shinar”) is another name for Sumer and Akkad, where Babylon was located (cf. Gen 10:10; 11:2; 14:1, 9; Josh 7:21; Isa 11:11; Zech 5:11).
[1:2] 86 tn Or “gods” (NCV, NRSV, TEV; also later in this verse). The Hebrew term can be used as a numerical plural for many gods or as a plural of majesty for one particular god. Since Nebuchadnezzar was a polytheist, it is not clear if the reference here is to many gods or one particular deity. The plural of majesty, while normally used for Israel’s God, is occasionally used of foreign gods (cf. BDB 43 s.v. אֱלֹהִים 1, 2). See Judg 11:24 (of the Moabite god Chemosh); 1 Sam 5:7 (of the Philistine god Dagon); 1 Kgs 11:33 (of the Canaanite goddess Astarte, the Moabite god Chemosh, and the Ammonite god Milcom); 2 Kgs 19:37 (of the Assyrian god Nisroch). Since gods normally had their own individual temples, Dan 1:2 probably refers to a particular deity, perhaps Marduk, the supreme god of Babylon, or Marduk’s son Nabu, after whom Nebuchadnezzar was named. The name Nebuchadnezzar means “Nabu has protected the son who will inherit” (HALOT 660 s.v. נְבוּכַדְרֶאצַּר). For a discussion of how temples functioned in Babylonian religion see H. Ringgren, Religions of the Ancient Near East, 77-81.
[1:2] 87 tn Heb “brought.” Though the Hebrew verb “brought” is repeated in this verse, the translation uses “brought…put” for stylistic variation.
[1:3] 88 tn Or “gave orders to.” Heb “said to.”
[1:3] 89 sn It is possible that the word Ashpenaz is not a proper name at all, but a general term for “innkeeper.” See J. J. Collins, Daniel (Hermeneia), 127, n. 9. However, the ancient versions understand the term to be a name, and the present translation (along with most English versions) understands the word in this way.
[1:3] 90 sn The word court official (Hebrew saris) need not mean “eunuch” in a technical sense (see Gen 37:36, where the term refers to Potiphar, who had a wife), although in the case of the book of Daniel there was in Jewish literature a common tradition to that effect. On the OT usage of this word see HALOT 769-70 s.v. סָרֹיס.
[1:3] 92 tn Heb “and from the seed of royalty and from the nobles.”
[1:4] 93 tn Heb “good of appearance.”
[1:4] 94 tn Heb “knowers of knowledge.”
[1:4] 95 tn Heb “understanders of knowledge.”
[1:4] 96 tn Heb “who had strength.”
[1:4] 97 tn Heb “to stand in the palace of the king.” Cf. vv. 5, 19.
[1:4] 98 sn The language of the Chaldeans referred to here is Akkadian, an East Semitic cuneiform language.
[1:4] 99 tn Heb “Chaldeans” (so KJV, NAB, NASB, NRSV). This is an ancient name for the Babylonians.
[1:5] 100 tn Heb “a thing of a day in its day.”
[1:5] 101 tn Heb “from the delicacies of the king.”
[1:5] 102 tn Or “educated.” See HALOT 179 s.v. I גדל.
[1:5] 103 tn Heb “stand before the king.”
[1:6] 104 tn Heb “and it happened that.”
[1:6] 105 tn Heb “among them”; the referent (the young men taken captive from Judah) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[1:6] 106 tn Heb “the sons of Judah.”
[1:6] 107 sn The names reflect a Jewish heritage. In Hebrew Daniel means “God is my judge”; Hananiah means “the Lord is gracious”; Mishael means “who is what God is?”; Azariah means “the Lord has helped.”
[1:7] 108 tc The LXX and Vulgate lack the verb here.
[1:7] 109 sn The meanings of the Babylonian names are more conjectural than is the case with the Hebrew names. The probable etymologies are as follows: Belteshazzar means “protect his life,” although the MT vocalization may suggest “Belti, protect the king” (cf. Dan 4:8); Shadrach perhaps means “command of Aku”; Meshach is of uncertain meaning; Abednego means “servant of Nego.” Assigning Babylonian names to the Hebrew youths may have been an attempt to erase from their memory their Israelite heritage.
[1:8] 110 tn Heb “placed on his heart.”
[1:8] 111 tn Or “would not make himself ceremonially unclean”; TEV “become ritually unclean.”
[1:8] sn Various reasons have been suggested as to why such food would defile Daniel. Perhaps it had to do with violations of Mosaic law with regard to unclean foods, or perhaps it had to do with such food having been offered to idols. Daniel’s practice in this regard is strikingly different from that of Esther, who was able successfully to conceal her Jewish identity.
[1:8] 112 tn Heb “with the delicacies of the king and with the wine of his drinking.”
[1:9] 113 tn Heb “Then God granted Daniel loyal love and compassion before the overseer of the court officials.” The expression “loyal love and compassion” is a hendiadys; the two words combine to express one idea.
[1:10] 114 tn Heb “The overseer of the court officials.” The subject has been specified in the translation for the sake of clarity.
[1:10] 115 tn Heb “assigned.” See v. 5.
[1:10] 116 tn Heb “Why should he see your faces thin from the young men who are according to your age?” The term translated “thin” occurs only here and in Gen 40:6, where it appears to refer to a dejected facial expression. The word is related to an Arabic root meaning “be weak.” See HALOT 277 s.v. II זעף.
[1:10] 117 tn The words “if that happened” are not in the Hebrew text but have been added in the translation for clarity.
[1:10] 118 tn Heb “my head.” Presumably this is an implicit reference to capital punishment (cf. NCV, TEV, CEV, NLT), although this is not entirely clear.
[1:11] 119 sn Having failed to convince the overseer, Daniel sought the favor of the warden whom the overseer had appointed to care for the young men.
[1:13] 120 tn Heb “let our appearance be seen before you.”
[1:13] 121 tn Heb “the appearance of.”
[1:13] 122 tn Heb “delicacies of the king.” So also in v. 15.
[1:13] 123 tn Heb “your servants.”
[1:14] 124 tn Heb “he”; the referent (the warden mentioned in v. 11) has been specified in the translation for clarity.
[1:14] 125 tn Heb “listened to them with regard to this matter.”
[1:14] 126 sn The number ten is sometimes used in the OT as an ideal number of completeness. Cf. v. 20; Zech 8:23; Rev 2:10.
[1:15] 127 tn Heb “fat of flesh”; KJV, ASV “fatter in flesh”; NASB, NRSV “fatter” (although this is no longer a sign of health in Western culture).
[1:16] 128 tn Heb “the wine of their drinking.”
[1:16] 129 tn The words “from their diet” are not in the Hebrew text but have been added in the translation for clarity.
[1:18] 130 tn Heb “at the end of the days which the king said to bring them.”
[1:19] 131 tn Heb “from all of them.”
[1:19] 132 tn Heb “stood before the king.”
[1:20] 133 tc The MT lacks the conjunction, reading the first word in the phrase as a construct (“wisdom of insight”). While this reading is not impossible, it seems better to follow Theodotion, the Syriac, the Vulgate, and the Sahidic Coptic, all of which have the conjunction.
[1:21] 135 sn The Persian king Cyrus’ first year in control of Babylon was 539
